As a current student I think I can provide an interesting perspective on the marketing industry, at least from the view of how it’s being taught to soon to be graduates.

Check out this article by Alana Taylor and pretty much replace the word “journalism” with “marketing”. That’s how I feel. Even as a student of one of, if not, the best marketing degrees in Victoria (modest, I know) the course is lacking. I can’t help but feel that a student who graduates in two years (like myself) is going to be so far behind the industry it’s not funny. Unless of course they’re researching this stuff independently or learning and blogging about it on the side.

I know as a blogger I’m far too bias towards the idea of blogging. But all evidence, according to my own personal experience, tells me that being active in this area is better than nothing. I imagine when I graduate I’ll be fine, but what about everyone else?

If you’re trying to market a product to me, particularly through social media, try becoming my mate.

A good start is to buy me a beer. Give me something of value for free, otherwise I can find another friend who will. But don’t keep buying me beers all night, because after a while I’ll start to think you have other motives. Eventually I’ll get the next round to make it worth your while.

Now you’ve got my thirst quenched (and yours), the next step is to earn the friendship. Hang around for a few hours and have a chat. Tell a story or two. If you’re more of the quiet type, just sit back and enjoy the conversation.

No yelling though. And you’re not allowed to get us kicked out either. Though you can be inappropriate because that’s what my mates do. But if you’re out with my Mum then you should act like a gentleman.

When I’m out drinking, I’m not looking to buy what ever it is you’re selling me. But when I wake up tomorrow with a hang over I’ll remember who you are. If you’ve been out with me and my friends on a few different nights, I’ll know where to find you when I need to.

Beer… the answer to all of life’s problems.

Juju Cole wrote a pretty neat article a few weeks about about how awesome the Australian social media marketing bloggers are. The article talks about the ridiculous amount of free content and resources available to brands wanting to establish themselves in this space.

The only problem, of course, is that brands need someone to tell them they should be adding these bloggers to their RSS Feed in the first place. Just like someone needs to tell them they should have a Google Alerts account set up.

Both are free, but to know about them you already need to be inside the social media circle. Getting there isn’t hard, but the majority of brands need someone to push them in.

So perhaps social media marketers, agencies and consultants should be looking to pull clients inside that circle?

I guess this is one of those posts that if I were to die tomorrow I would be annoyed this came up first on my blog.

But. I have a question which probably falls best under the Almost Pointless Blog Design category. Should the “Older Posts” button at the bottom of every blog be on the left hand side or the right hand side?

If you read chronologically from left to right then I imagine it should be on the left. But if you want your blog to open like a book I suppose it should appear on the right.

Thoughts?

Something that has always bugged me is how people suggest good bloggers should be consistent with their content.

I don’t understand why this medium of new media needs to comply with traditional media practises.

My Dad reads his newspaper every morning. Therefore his news paper must land on his doorstep at 6am each day. But I don’t read the newspaper, I have an my RSS Feed. I want things to come in as they are published, not once a day at the same time.

I try to post every second day. But sometimes it’s longer and sometimes it’s shorter. People subscribe to my blog and pull my feed into their reader when a post is published. So why does my content need to be consistent?

I was on another episode of the Gen Y Marketing Podcast and Nat, who incidentally has a great little blog, suggested there should bee some sort of framework on the levels of engagement when it came to social media. I couldn’t find anything so here are my thoughts.

Unless you’re specifically targeting a certain group of evangelists, every campaign should have three levels; Low, Medium and High…

Low
These are usually the consumers you simply broadcast to. Little interaction with the brand takes place and at this level consumers are not all that passionate or loyal toward your brand.

On the episode we discussed the recent Dunlop Volley campaign. At this level of engagement, it is the consumer who just see the ads. Another example is the television series Lost, and again on this level the consumer would just be watching the show.

Medium
Here things step up a bit and the consumer seeks further interaction with your brand. They become more engaged and to do so they might head to the Dunlop Volley website and look around or purchase a season of Lost on DVD and watch the Special Features. Some evangelism starts to develop on this level.

High
These are your most loyal and most passionate brand evangelists and they want more interaction with the brand than anyone else. These consumers want to create their own UGC for Dunlop Volleys. These were the ones leading the pack on Lost’s massive ARG. As a marketer, these consumers are worth the most do you.

With that said, sometimes it might be appropriate to target your campaigns at only one or two levels of engagement. McDonald’s went for a mass approach with their Name It Burger campaign. This was done on the Low level where you simply had to enter a name and you were done. Pepsi asked consumers to design their own can. You were restricted to a basic design application on the website but this allowed for a lower barrier of entry and would be considered on the Medium level. Doritos ran the High level You Make It, We’ll Play It campaign where consumers were encouraged to film, edit and submit a video online.

The question becomes do you run a campaign that allows for all three levels or specifically focuses on one? But as with most marketing questions, it depends on your brand, product, campaign and objective.

Check out this article by Paul Boutin which appeared in Wired Magazine a few days ago. Or even just read the opening line…
“Thinking about launching your own blog? Here’s some friendly advice: Don’t. And if you’ve already got one, pull the plug.”
Just recently my blog celebrated its first birthday. I look at how much I have achieved given the fact I’m a nineteen year old student with no actual experience in the marketing industry and have not choice but to conclude that this dude is a tool.

Obviously I’m bias and my readership will be too (dur), but what do you think?

Thanks for the article, Wags.

… remarkably bad, that is.

I can’t say enough about the importance of being remarkable. Seth Godin’s Purple Cow is what they should be teaching in university marketing degrees. Matt Granfield loves it almost as much as I do.

But it’s easy to be remarkable when you’re product or service isn’t good. But that’s not the kind of remarkable you want to be.

Bigpond started using Twitter. At first they sucked. But it appears they’ve listened and turned things around. However during this process some legal implications were raised, specifically the Spam Act 2003.

After research of my own, speaking to the Australian Communications and Media Authority and getting in touch with Dr Melissa de Zwart from the Faculty of Law at Monash University, I have summarised the results…

Prior to my research I questioned whether this legislation might also include things like commenting on a blog or writing on my Facebook wall. However it is clear the Act does not cover this. Next I looked at something like Facebook Chat and whether this could be considered an Instant Message, however becoming friends with the brand would be adequate consent with the ability to defriend them acting as an unsubscribe option.

So this leaves two areas which are questionable. Sending a private message on Facebook, if considered an email, and replying to a user on Twitter who is not following you, if considered instant messaging.

According to Dr Melissa de Zwart, this is irrelevant as the Terms of Service by the hosting party cover this type of third party communication. You agree to these terms when you sign up.

So should brands be worried about any legal implications of the Spam Act 2003 when it comes to social media marketing?

No. Not at all.

But Dr Melissa de Zwart did suggest the definition of “spam” could do with an update.